CreMensch learns from your live Meta campaigns what actually converts cheaply, and gives every new creative a reasoned fit score — before you upload it.
You spend thousands a month on Meta campaigns and produce new creatives on gut feeling. Some work, some burn budget — and you find out which is which only after a week or two of expensive data.
In one campaign we analyzed, ₪20,490 was spent across seven ads. The gap between the cheapest and the most expensive creative: ₪132 vs ₪390 per conversion — three times over, on the same audience. Nobody ever read the "why" out of Ads Manager.
A deep read of every ad: true cost per conversion — cross-checked against your sales system, not just Meta's reporting — fatigue curves, who buys, on which placement, and which copy themes correlate with cheap conversions.
A video or image plus the planned copy. The tool measures everything itself: format, aspect ratio, length, hook brightness, copy themes.
Every attribute is compared against what's proven on your specific audience. Every point is backed by a number from your data — not generic internet "best practices."
Fit score for the LAL-PURCHASE audience: 56.1/100 - Video format: 5 ads in campaign, ₪185.5 per conversion → 53.1 - 'Urgency' theme: 7 ads, ₪189.7 per conversion → 50.0 - Stories placement: ₪101 vs ₪105 average elsewhere → 52.1 - Freshness: a similar ad is still stable → 70 - Hook: bright opener — stops the scroll better than the dark openers measured ✓ - Length 47s: only ~3.5% of your viewers reach the end → penalty Scale: 60+ good · 45-60 fair · <45 the data is against it
The run above is real — and the "fair" score it gave matches how that creative actually performed in the campaign.
Mensch (Yiddish): a decent, straight-talking person who tells you the truth and helps you improve. Alongside the score, every check returns three kinds of lines — real examples from a live campaign's video analysis:
"The satellite dive and the venue renders — the location theme converts at ₪183 on average and has no active ad. The footage is already shot."
"The first 3 seconds are dark with no on-screen text — hook retention is only 7.7% (your best opener holds 27%). Open on the bright shot and put the deadline in the first frame."
"The lineup section skews young-club, but your actual buyers are women 45–54. Worth an A/B: an experience-and-venue cut vs the lineup cut."
Your data, not someone else's benchmark. Every comparison is against what worked on your specific audience — warm audiences behave the opposite of cold ones, and the tool knows the difference.
Real conversions, not just the pixel. The tool cross-checks Meta's reporting against your sales or ticketing system — scores rest on money that actually came in, not an algorithm's attribution.
The tool sees the creative. Not just metadata: it measures the opener, length against real drop-off, and runs a frame-by-frame visual analysis that explains why an ad holds or loses viewers.
Honestly, like a real mensch:
This is a decision-support tool, not a prophecy. A gap of under 10 points between two options is a statistical tie, and accuracy grows with every campaign the tool learns. What it does promise: your next decision will rest on what actually happened in your account — instead of finding out two weeks and thousands of shekels later.
Joining takes two minutes: fill in your details, approve a view-only connection request — and within one business day you'll have your first campaign analysis.
Get started